It has been some time since I’d seen Autobahn (the stand alone version, not what runs via Bloomberg or Reuters or whatever) in action. And I’ve not really ever had a good look at what they offer in IRS.
Well I can say I’m quite impressed. It is a single-dealer platform sure, but it really is the best thing out there in terms of functionality for the e-Swaps market place (sorry to tell you SwapsStream) and, along with BARX, product coverage. I’m talking Outright, Curve Spreads, Butterflies, 18 currencies, RFQ, Streaming Click and Trade, Limit Orders. And the best of all? Unwinds. You find the deal (whether dealt on the phone or electronically) you wish to unwind and open a ticket to unwind the swap there and then. Add in trading API, STP and even the simplicity of e-mail confirmations.
Being single-dealer, albeit one of Waratah’s Tier-1 FI e-Trading dealers, is a massive problem. Multi-dealer is undoubtedly what clients such as Hedge Funds and Tier-1 Funds want. But Deutsche Bank are hardly going to invite their competitors onboard, are they?
So what to do? Do the likes of LiquidityHub and TradeWeb (sorry to leave you out SwapsStream) simply copy the functionality? No trade mark on what Autobahn does, it simply replicates phone trading in a more efficient manner…the whole point of e-Trading.
Indeed TradeWeb does offer curve trades and butterflies. But it remains a Request For Quote driven government bond platform running on architecture from the late 90’s/early noughties. Although I hear they’re looking to jump on the Request For Stream (RFS) bandwagon after Fusion went ahead late last year.
LiquidityHub appears to want all functionality to fit into the RFS model, which counts out the vast majority of it’s Price Makers from being able to do broken dates, unwinds and also butterflies etc.
Time will tell, but certainly a multi-dealer platform that offers Autobahn-like functionality and products would go down well.
January 29, 2008 at 10:32 pm
A multi dealer platform that support product innovation is the way forward. But the incumbents like Bloomberg and TradeWeb are saddled with arthritic software architectures that couldn’t possibly allow individual dealers to innovate unilaterally on the same multidealer platform.
We need a new market entrant with a genuinely cutting edge architecture…
January 30, 2008 at 7:51 am
I agree etrading, however I don’t see any new innovative platforms coming through in the near future (as I’ve mentioned last year). This is because I don’t see the Banks supporting them unless they own them.
LiquidityHub they own, but it utilises BBG and RTRS as distributors which means it is constrained by them as much as they’re constrained by it.
Look at SwapsStream, meant to be the most innovative swaps platform around. They have about five Banks on there and I bet that commitment is tepid at best. SwapsStream will claim they’ve chosen to keep the numbers low but that, I’m afraid, is complete spin!
January 31, 2008 at 9:31 am
are we really pinning our hopes on a multi-dealer platform that fits all coming along, rather than buyside desktop aggregating the liquidity it is connected to, and doing the whizzo functionality (number crunching and order routing) that the buyside in question has built in and needs in order to differentiate themselves?
January 31, 2008 at 12:22 pm
Yep.
I just don’t see that many/any buysiders willing to put the necessary in to build what you describe Holky. I wish they would. Certainly Tier-1 talk about this and so they should, but when will the “money where you mouth is” time? They want to be given it for free, which means they’ll not get the bespoke solution they seek.
I don’t buy into the LatentZero idea of direct links to several Banks being aggregated, happening in the near future. I mean how has this progressed in 2007?
Apologies, I’m in a bit of a negative mindset re: FI e-trading’s prospects for 2008.
See my latest post….you may want to slit your wrists afterwards….or my throat!
March 5, 2008 at 5:30 pm
Giuseppi nuti is the man responsible for a lot of the functionality of Autobahn.
He is literally a rocket scientist and with a small team has been able to develop autobahn from a govvies perspective.
Just thought I’d give him a shout as an unsung hero of e-trading!
March 5, 2008 at 5:37 pm
There’s your answer TradeWeb, LiquidityHub etc.
Bid up for Signor Nuti!
Sodappa, don’t suppose Giuseppe Nuti is you?
August 27, 2008 at 10:06 pm
[...] imagine what latency could cost db autobahn or BARX. Autobahn appear to have the lead today in the SDP space, hence I wonder what 100ms latency does to the Deutsche bank e-trading revenue? 1% of [...]
November 12, 2008 at 6:00 am
[...] Lehman’s fallout and venturing into the e-trading space. I’m guessing this isn’t SDP [...]
July 29, 2009 at 11:45 pm
Hello! I´d like to know if DB Autobahn is available for personal finance (individuals). Thank you!