MTS


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6651b660-46fc-11dd-876a-0000779fd2ac.html

MTS coming under more pressure in their Western European stronghold. Even their push into Emerging Markets will not make up for these loses.

(LONDON, UK) Xtrakter, the fixed income market utility, launched today a league table of
execution venues for the market. The league table outlines both the top 10 venues of
execution for the Fixed Income and Equities markets.

OTC was also the largest method of execution for fixed income securities processed by
representing 88.01% of the total share. Tradeweb (Europe) Ltd held 1.93% and MTS SPA
held 1.87% of the total share processed by Xtrakter. Below is a breakdown of the top 10
venues of execution for the Fixed Income market.
TOP 10 Venues of Execution for the Fixed Income market*:
Venue of Execution: % of Xtrakter share
Over The Counter 88.01%
Tradeweb (Europe) Ltd 1.93%
MTS SPA 1.87%
ICAP Electronic (Europe) 1.23%
Euro Global MTS 0.75%
Bondvision 0.65%
London Stock Exchange 0.47%
Euro MTS 0.38%
ICAP Electronic (USA) 0.32%
GFI Credit Match 0.24%
Other venues 4.17%

MTS no. 1 in terms of e-trading with 3.65% (adding all their businesses mentioned above).

Is Bloomberg part of this? Is it in “Other Venues”? Is this on number of trades or volume? Over what period of time?

So many questions……

Sorry, this is about a week old but have been busy:

MTS Group, the pan-European electronic trading platform for government bonds, is pleased to announce an agreement with the Brazilian Ministry of Finance for the creation of an electronic market dedicated to the trading of local currency sovereign securities issued by the Federative Republic of Brazil.

I guess this is acknowledgment that their model has run its course in Europe and it is time to move further afield (already in Israel). Obrigado!

Like David Bowie and Queen………….the FT reports what many have known for a while; that several European Debt Agencies are looking to have more than just MTS as the e-Trading platform of choice for their bonds.

Belgium have been first to open up their market by adding Brokertec and eSpeed to MTS as the official platforms for Belgian Debt. The Netherlands looks to be next. Indeed at a seminar held by the Securities Institute last week in London, ICAP mentioned that they believed the Dutch DMO would go down the three platform path as well.

What is a concern is the MTS Chairman’s, obviously PR written, response: “MTS has a strong track record of working with the Belgian DMO and Primary Dealers to deliver a premier trading platform offering unparalleled liquidity, transparency and efficiency.”

Kind of begs the question…….so what?

From Dow Jones, the first dealer pulls out in protest against Hedgies and prop Houses potentially being allowed into MTS:
Credit Suisse Group decided to stop making markets in European government bonds on four trading platforms operated by MTS SpA, protesting MTS’s decision to open trading to hedge funds.

The Credit Suisse decision could pave the way for other banks to shift their bond market-making businesses away from MTS as platform requirements ease. Rivals include Bloomberg LP, Eurex Bonds, ICAP PLC’s BrokerTec platform and Espeed Inc., which is an affiliate of Cantor Fitzgerald LP.

The move comes at a sensitive time for MTS, which will face greater competition from these platforms next year when the Belgian and Dutch government debt agencies plan to relax their primary-dealer rules for the first time to allow banks to choose which platforms on which to make markets.

Some government debt agencies, such as in Belgium and the Netherlands, have required banks to trade on a platform run by MTS in order to centralize liquidity and make it easier to monitor dealer performance. Dealers have been lobbying European debt agencies for several years to be able to trade on the platform of their choice in order to create competition between them on fees and services. Some agencies are now responding.

Credit Suisse switched last month from operating on MTS France and MTS Spain as a price maker and became a price taker, according to Stanislas de Caumont, managing director of fixed income at Credit Suisse. The bank has switched to making a market in French bonds on BrokerTec and in Spanish bonds on Senaf, the local platform for Spanish debt, Mr. de Caumont said.

Credit Suisse also has told the Belgian and Dutch debt agencies as well as MTS Belgium and MTS Amsterdam that it intends to stop market making on those platforms when they allow dealers to choose their trading venue, he said.

Credit Suisse said Friday it was prompted to move its market-making business because of its opposition to MTS’s plans to allow nonbanking entities, such as hedge funds and proprietary trading firms, to trade on its EuroMTS benchmark euro-denominated bond-trading platform.

The bank, as with some other primary dealers, believes hedge funds could exploit the European market-making system. Mr. de Caumont said the funds aren’t interested in providing liquidity in the bond market by buying and selling bonds when counterparties need them to, but instead simply want to make money with high-frequency automated spread trading.

“Given MTS’s push to open its EuroMTS platform to hedge funds, we feel better fulfilling our quoting obligations on another platform that is restricted to primary dealers,” Mr. de Caumont said.

MTS said it is keen to work through banks’ concerns about the new market, which will be subject to rules that will prevent exploitative behavior. “Feedback from the banks is very important to us,” spokesman Boris Nadenic said. “We understand that they have questions, and we are working with the banks to structure a market that meets all participant needs.”

Why do I say this? Well, below are the positives and negatives.

Positive:
Project Fusion: having direct dealer ownership sures up liquidity in the face of the likes of LiquidityHub
– The no. 1 FI e-trading ECN
– Thomson-Reuters merger allows for greater resource access (esp. via Reuters salesforce in Asia and other EM’s)

Negative:
– lower volumes in Govt bonds, their bread and butter, due to the credit crunch
– these volumes are under further threat from Hedge Fund interest in joining MTS
– in over a year TW’s credit offering has failed to impact MarketAxess or Bloomberg
– despite the no. 1 status, TW’s functionality and architechture has failed to advance to any great degree and it is difficult to see this happening in 2008 (see next point). This ranges from the simple (market depth) to the more complex (API to accomodate algo trading)
– Thomson-Reuters merger means TW could get caught up in big firm bureacracy

Overall positive but not without a few things to watch out for.

FT reports that MTS have now decided to include “non-bank entities” and give them “broker-dealer status” on EuroMTS.

I can only assume they’ll not be able to access the local MTS markets e.g. MTS Italy etc.

I guess the ball is now in the EPDA’s court. Will be interested to see their response, although MTS claim their members have been consulted as part of the process.

Next Page »